Back to Insights
Expert views

Freelance leads - why community beats the ranking system

Jessica, a member of the TruthWorks community, shares why algorithms optimise for speed while communities optimise for fit, and why fit is what actually gets freelancers hired and keeps them hired.

Published
September 17, 2026
|
with

Jessica Celi

Why I prefer community over algorithms when it comes to getting freelance leads

What I trust more than a ranking system, and why it works. 

A few weeks ago my LinkedIn feed turned into a Upwork feed. Every second post was someone reacting to something this popular platform had done: new tiers, a redesigned profile system, a smarter AI shortlisting clients' applicants before a human even opens a proposal. I got curious, went digging, and ended up sharing my honest take in TruthWorks freelancer community.

This is the longer version of that post. But the more I sat with it, the more I realised that this popular platform was just the trigger. What I want to talk about is bigger than one platform: why I've stopped chasing algorithms for leads, and why community became the thing that works instead.

The pattern behind the platform

That platform isn't the only place doing this, it's just the most visible one right now. Most platforms decide for you: which parts of your profile get shown, which proposals get surfaced first, who gets shortlisted before a client ever reads what you wrote. Efficient for the client, sure. But it also means your visibility depends less on your work and more on how well you perform for a system whose rules you don't control and that can change overnight.

That's not a criticism of any one company. It's just what happens when a platform optimizes for scale: speed and volume win, and the slower, human parts of finding work start to get squeezed out.

Why I never got traction there, and what worked instead

I never got much traction on those kinds of platforms, and I didn't put a lot of effort into my profile either. I had one once, then deleted it a few months later. Why? Because I've been freelancing for years, across a few different fields, and the thing that has consistently gotten me a lead was never a profile or a bid. It was a real conversation, one where I listened to what a potential client needed and could see clearly whether I was the right person for it. No algorithm has ever done that for me. A conversation has, every time.

That's why showing up in communities has worked so much better for me. Not because I'm trying to sell something the moment I walk in, but the opposite: I go in to connect, not to pitch. TruthWorks is one of those spaces for me now, alongside a few others I've talked about before. In a community, someone gets to know your work over time, sees how you think, and recommends you because they trust you, not because a system ranked you above someone else that week. It's not about mass. Ten real conversations will get you further than a hundred leads that go nowhere.

I put this to Emily, co-founder of TruthWorks, in a recent conversation.

{{quote-item-1}}

Building a network from zero

Being an expert working on a completely different continent from the one I grew up on, and someone who only started building a life and contacts here a couple of years ago, I didn't have the luxury of an existing network to lean on. I had to build mine from nothing.

So these last few weeks, I've been reaching out to people online, not to sell anything, just to connect. Which feels strange in a world where everyone's trying to sell you something. Of course I want to sell my services too, I'm a freelancer, everything depends on how I market myself. But there's a difference between reaching out because you're desperate and reaching out because you genuinely want to know someone's work. I've met people with fascinating backgrounds this way, some I may never meet in person, and I'm still glad to have them in my corner.

Real, authentic relationships, the kind built on an actual exchange rather than a second intention, are what I value most. And that exchange has to be mutual to mean anything.

The bigger question: what happens to trust and fit

When any platform optimizes for efficiency, something has to give, and it's usually the slow stuff: trust, fit, the sense that both sides understand what they're getting into.

Speed is a real value if you're a client drowning in applications. But it also nudges people to trust a score, a badge, an AI summary, instead of building trust the slower way: through conversation, referrals, a portfolio someone walked them through in person. Platforms that tighten their rules around communicating off their systems are really saying the same thing: trust should live inside the metrics they control, not in the relationships we build for ourselves.

I don't think that's a neutral trade. When you optimize for efficiency, you're optimizing away the very things that make a working relationship good long-term: shared values, mutual understanding, the sense that someone chose you on purpose. Communities aren't optimized for volume. They're optimized for fit, and fit is what actually holds up over time.

So would I recommend these algorithm-based platforms?

I asked this on Circle and I still don't have a clean answer: if you're new to freelancing, would you recommend platforms like it? I never put in the time, effort, or money it probably takes to see real results there, so I can't tell you with any certainty whether it works.

But here's what I do know: TruthWorks is a platform too, a commercial one, where freelancers get booked for real work. The difference is that it's built on a community first. The two shape each other: the community is what makes the leads mean something, and the platform is what turns that trust into actual paid work. Neither one works as well without the other.

So this isn't really community versus platform, it's about which platform. One that ranks you against strangers and calls it a match, or one where the person hiring you already knows your work because they've seen you show up. I'd rather bet on myself, my own work, and the people who already know it, than on an algorithm I don't control.

Platforms can absolutely work. Choose one with a community at its heart, built for real connections and real leads, not a faceless algorithm deciding who gets seen.

Curious what a community-first platform looks like in practice? Find out more about TruthWorks, where humans come before algorithms.

Sources
Upwork's Spring 2026 Update: What Changed for Freelancers? — UpAlerts

Key Take-aways

  • Algorithms rank you against strangers. Communities work because someone actually knows you.
  • A real conversation has always outperformed a polished profile or a winning bid.
  • Platforms built for speed and scale quietly squeeze out the slower human stuff: trust, fit, and mutual understanding.
  • Ten genuine conversations beat a hundred leads that go nowhere.
  • The best platforms don't replace community, they turn the trust it builds into real paid work.

The reason we built TruthWorks around community first is simple. A ranking algorithm can tell you someone's available and capable. It can't tell you if they're the right fit. That only comes from meeting these freelancers, seeing their work, and verifying them like we do. You can't shortcut that kind of trust.

featured experts
Emily Firth
Co‑Founder of TruthWorks

Helping leadership teams connect the dots between people, brand and business outcomes, with truth as the non‑negotiable.

Learn more
Featured Podcast
Expert views

Need an Expert for your challenge?

We've sourced the best independent global talent so you don't have to. Every People and Culture specialism covered in one place by our trusted Experts. Search, book, brief and pay through one easy-to-use platform.

Explore Experts

Book a demo and see
the platform working live.

  • Just exploring? We’ll show you how it works and answer your questions.
  • Got a live challenge? We'll search, shortlist and brief an Expert on the call.
Book your demoNot right now×